"Postmodernist philosophers, in general, argue that truth is always contingent on historical and social context rather than being absolute and universal—and that truth is always partial and "at issue" rather than being complete and certain." Wikipedia
POST AND POSPOST MODERNISM
It seems today that al those posts and their anchors and buttresses were rotten and crumbling inside even before they were plagiarized. But destroying is always thought to be easy, while replacing formerly imposing edifices not so simple. Yet, it may come to pass that one day there will be a reconstruction with many more posts.
These are just approaches to discussing “what”, “why” and “how”. They could have had some major benefits in addition to some architectural and literary works, if their proponents were not so destructive of commonly held views, beliefs, knowledge, thought and activities. Not enough was created to replace that which was destroyed.
Denying the authority of science and seemingly accepting and following nihilistic ideas eventually allowed the followers of post modernism to support those beliefs which were based on denying the reality of science and the benefits of the scientific method, leading to political problems, major power intervention on regional and national governance, as well as sterile definitions of well-being, joy, despair, entertainment, utility and ambition.
We have entered a disruptive and dystopic age of pre dissonance en route to new posts and moderns.
Ahmet Cafer Celebiler
January 9. 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment